<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mootools v1!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chromasynthetic.com/blog/archive/38/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chromasynthetic.com/blog/archive/38</link>
	<description>a blog about web design and development</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.chromasynthetic.com/blog/archive/38#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromasynthetic.com/blog/archive/38#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Mootools beats everything out there is what the difference is! The design theory behind mootools was smaller is better. So it's much smaller than most javascript frameworks out there. It's also been tested on Safari and supports it rather well, I believe.

Prototype is too bloated simply because you'll never use all of the functionality it offers. Mootools is modular and lets you download only what you need, thus reducing file size even more. I suggest you drop prototype and switch to mootools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mootools beats everything out there is what the difference is! The design theory behind mootools was smaller is better. So it&#8217;s much smaller than most javascript frameworks out there. It&#8217;s also been tested on Safari and supports it rather well, I believe.</p>
<p>Prototype is too bloated simply because you&#8217;ll never use all of the functionality it offers. Mootools is modular and lets you download only what you need, thus reducing file size even more. I suggest you drop prototype and switch to mootools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.chromasynthetic.com/blog/archive/38#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chromasynthetic.com/blog/archive/38#comment-257</guid>
		<description>It looks nice.  Just out of curiosity, is there a difference between mootools and script.aculo.us?  I have tried out script.aculo.us a bit, but decided against it because of incompatabilities in Safari.

But you have to be proud, I have started using prototype.  I know, late to the party, but I'm coming around slowly, but surely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks nice.  Just out of curiosity, is there a difference between mootools and script.aculo.us?  I have tried out script.aculo.us a bit, but decided against it because of incompatabilities in Safari.</p>
<p>But you have to be proud, I have started using prototype.  I know, late to the party, but I&#8217;m coming around slowly, but surely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
